2) That would imply that people are entitled to that something in the first place, though, wouldn't it?
No, it doesn't imply anything like that. The question postulates that a text exists and that it is not made accessible and the question was if that does keep the text from the people who would prefer the text. The answer to that is yes. Whether this is something that should or shouldn't be done, should be seen as a good thing, a bad thing, anything in-between, or whatever judgment someone wants to infer from this, depends entirely on the person making that judgment. That doesn't change the basic fact that an existing text that is not made accessible is in fact not accessible to the people who would like to access that text.
no subject
No, it doesn't imply anything like that. The question postulates that a text exists and that it is not made accessible and the question was if that does keep the text from the people who would prefer the text. The answer to that is yes. Whether this is something that should or shouldn't be done, should be seen as a good thing, a bad thing, anything in-between, or whatever judgment someone wants to infer from this, depends entirely on the person making that judgment. That doesn't change the basic fact that an existing text that is not made accessible is in fact not accessible to the people who would like to access that text.