I still think there's an integrity of the text that i'm uncomfortable letting a reader change.
I may be kneejerking because the examples were about sex but OMG. Are we gonna bleep next?
If I like the story, I read the story. But I don't pick and choose which parts to read or not read. It's a Gesamtkunstwerk :)
I'm kinda equally respond to readerly addition of ratings etc. I'm fascinated with the fact that certain things can come across STRONGER in audio. Having a noncon scene spoken in your ear may be much more intense than reading and being able to skim it. I still would feel very uncomfortable in adding ratings or warnings if they aren't there. I guess one could have ADDITIONAL reader warnings. But...there's creative interpretation and evaluation. And adding a rape warning, for example, might5 be more the latter than the former. [I'm willing to be convinced otherwise on this one, however :) The editing the text to getting rid of the pr0n? Not so much so!]
no subject
I still think there's an integrity of the text that i'm uncomfortable letting a reader change.
I may be kneejerking because the examples were about sex but OMG. Are we gonna bleep next?
If I like the story, I read the story. But I don't pick and choose which parts to read or not read. It's a Gesamtkunstwerk :)
I'm kinda equally respond to readerly addition of ratings etc. I'm fascinated with the fact that certain things can come across STRONGER in audio. Having a noncon scene spoken in your ear may be much more intense than reading and being able to skim it. I still would feel very uncomfortable in adding ratings or warnings if they aren't there. I guess one could have ADDITIONAL reader warnings. But...there's creative interpretation and evaluation. And adding a rape warning, for example, might5 be more the latter than the former. [I'm willing to be convinced otherwise on this one, however :) The editing the text to getting rid of the pr0n? Not so much so!]