Jesse the K (
jesse_the_k) wrote in
podficmeta2010-01-22 02:02 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Should readers get permission to make podfic?
While I just argued that the act of podficcing adds "fannish value" to a work, I'm unsure that readers must obtain an OK from the writer to make a recording.
Since I'm a newbie, I did some research. While I don't think it's possible for a podfic to fundamentally change a source in the same way, I started with remixes, since there's the same "permission" issue there. It seems most remix challenges are based on a mutual remix: by participating in writing, each fan also permits their work to be remixed (with one "safe" work held inviolate).
The Fanlore Wiki told me:
Current metadata don't state whether the podfic's reader has the writer's permission. Would the absence, permission or refusal of writer's OK change how you'd choose or read podfics?
Since I'm a newbie, I did some research. While I don't think it's possible for a podfic to fundamentally change a source in the same way, I started with remixes, since there's the same "permission" issue there. It seems most remix challenges are based on a mutual remix: by participating in writing, each fan also permits their work to be remixed (with one "safe" work held inviolate).
The Fanlore Wiki told me:
begin quote
Though remixing in both fanfiction and vidding has become enormously popular, not all fans embrace the concept. [... snip ...] Though some fans feel any story is fair game for remixing, others believe that permission should be gained from the author first before using their work as a jumping-off point. Many fans feel it's hypocritical to reuse the original creations of the copyright holders in the canon while protesting that anyone should be allowed to remake their fanworks.
quote ends
Current metadata don't state whether the podfic's reader has the writer's permission. Would the absence, permission or refusal of writer's OK change how you'd choose or read podfics?
no subject
But there's so much stuff out there yet unrecorded, it seems unnecessary to record something that the author has asked not be.
no subject
Since most authors are silent, do you think that should be understood as tacit permission?
no subject
I think it's polite to ask for permission, or at least, to let the author know a recording is being made. I think that a podfic version of a story is a transformation of the original work into a different medium and not the equivalent of text-to-speech.
no subject
I find it interesting that you're saying it's polite to let the author know a recording is being made. It seems to me that if you tell the author mid-process, prior restraint on publication seems more reasonable than if somebody had already finished the whole thing. Was that intentional or not?
no subject
However, in one case I refused any recording by a podficcer who had recorded and distributed other authors' work without permission or notification. For some reason, she asked me about a planned podfic and was astonished (and felt persecuted) when I was annoyed about her other recordings. It got nasty.
So, with that in mind, I meant "is" as the ongoing as well as the immediate harvesting of an author's work.
I realized after the encounter with the unauthorized podficcer and the friends to whom she distributed her recordings, that some people will do whatever they want with fan work. They bristle at the idea that they need the author's "permission" but might dimly understand that it's polite to let the writer know that the recording of her work is taking place.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
So, basically, I was thinking about a situation where one asked for permission, and was denied. You could go ahead and do it anyway, but why would you want to when there are so many people out there who would be fine with their fic being recorded?
no subject
And I would think that the reason you would want to record a fic, either from an untraceable or disapproving author, was because you wanted to record that fic, in the same way that I write June/Neal instead of (Elizabeth)/Peter/Neal in White Collar, because I'm interested in that scenario more than the one that would garner lots of comments fast. Or even more basically, why people choose to make fan works instead of imagining everything from 'scratch'?
Stories aren't fungible.
no subject
You're right that stories aren't fungible, and I shouldn't have implied they were. As a writer, I find that there's never just one story I want to tell, though, even if I'm focused on a specific pairing or fandom. And from a listener's perspective, there's so much out there yet unrecorded. There's no one specific story I've been wishing someone would do.
no subject
I don't think people have or will frequently make that distinction. So, if we have a politeness standard that says, "You should ask the author," and one is unable to ask, the politeness standard then implies, "Too bad, so sad, all of that fic for which an author cannot be found is now unavailable for additional transformation." And I think that's a great loss.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-01-24 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)*is puzzled*
This assumption proceeds from ...?
signed,
lr
no subject
I've also had read some arguments (none of which I can find at the moment), which persuasively make the argument that the promulgation of some sorts of free licenses (specifically, CC) which explicitly permit activities which are legal regardless (specifically, transformative work making commentary on the original), puts a negative pressure on the actions when taken towards those works for which the action would still be legal, but no explicit license has been given.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-01-25 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Your second paragraph is looking, to me, like an issue separate and apart from the original question, but before even I try to address it, I want to make sure I understand, because this phrase
"puts a negative pressure on the actions when taken towards those works for which the action would still be legal"
is confusing me.
Are you suggesting
a) the absence of explicit refusal should indicate the presence of acquiescence?
b) the absence of explicit refusal does indicate the presence of acquiescence?
signed,
lr
no subject
I'm not sure how to handle these situations. I sometimes wonder if reasonable objection right might be the way to go. If you have any issues or don't want me to do this I will certainly respect them; otherwise I assume your tacit permission?
no subject
Zvi may be right that a standard of "ask first" would lead to a perception that if someone couldn't find contact information, zie shouldn't record the fic. I still think that "asked and never got an answer" is a more defensible position (should the need for defense arrive) than "never asked."
no subject